Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

Le 20/02/2013 14:55, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
>> Given all this, I think it should be a priority for the WG to advance
>> the currently described functionality to REC.
> With navigation (out of scope wrt Charter), exclusions (collision with
> a chartered document), regions (collision with a chartered document),
> footnotes (relying on magic), bookmarks (underspecified) and more?

Daniel, I think that Håkon’s comment quoted here was about css3-page, 
not GCPM.

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:01:14 UTC