W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css-variables] Different syntax for variable definition and use

From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:17:44 -0500
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <1361161064.31921.263.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 17:31 -0500, Brian Kardell wrote:
[...]
> If it weren't for the fact that the meaning is overloaded i would suggest
> that auth-* as a prefix would make me fully happy...  But honestly.. A good
> name with a few chars is tough.  I still hold that x-* is entirely sweet :)

At the risk of irritating Tab again :-) (sorry), I also prefer x-* or,
even better, my-* (emphasising it's user-defined), or cp- for Custom
Property, with my() or cp() to get them.

Tab, I do think it would help if Example 2 didn't have an "if" in it,
but was instead more obviously a property,
  var-font-family: "Helevetica", "Folio", sans;
for example, and have the "if(x > 5) this.width = 10;" example later,
e.g. merge it with example 3.

Maybe it's too late to change CSSVariablesDeclaration to
CSSCustomPropertiesDeclaration and no doubt people will get used to
whatever is used in any case.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 04:17:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT