W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css4-images] Add format() hints to image()

From: Nicholas Shanks <nickshanks@nickshanks.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:37:13 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+hEJVWzm69VzfM-ehGi1ppqfBx0zxVbej54zoaFbJkpZaey2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
I would rather see:

jpeg-xr
png-anim

than "jxr" and "apng".

also, since mpo, jpeg-2000 and jpeg-xr are all supported by only one client
each, there's I think they can be left out of a 'critical' set, if that's
what you are trying to define, but the two 2D formats should be defined if
you are intending to be a bit broader with initial defined format names.


On Friday, 15 February 2013, Jake Archibald wrote:

> On 14 February 2013 17:32, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Do you have any idea what set of format strings we should initially
> support?
>
> gif
> jpeg
> png
> webp
> svg
> mpo (3d format support by DS browser)
> jxr (jpeg xr, supported in IE)
>
> The above seems like the minimum set. I don't think we need any
> subsets of those, although SVG could be a likely candidate if you
> wanted to be explicit about SMIL. With something as complex as SVG,
> it's probably better do check for basic support then do the rest of
> the feature detection in the SVG file itself.
>
> I don't think we need to include formats that aren't optimised for the
> web, such as bmp, tiff, tga, eps etc. I didn't include jpeg2000 as no
> one seems interested in supporting it.
>
>

-- 
Nicholas.
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 11:37:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT