W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-conditional] conditionText serialization [WAS]: Review of the new grammar for @supports

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:51:22 -0800
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130208005122.GA18072@crum.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2013-02-07 23:51 +0100, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:30:08 +0100, L. David Baron
> <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> >I've implemented this resolution [...] in
> >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/#the-csssupportsrule-interface
> >https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/7dace721dff3
> >
> >Does that seem ok to you?
> 
> Yes, this accurately reflects is what we agreed to.
> 
> That said, for the benefit of the reader who is reading this without
> knowledge of the discussion we had, I wonder if it would be worth
> being explicit about the fact that collapsing multiple levels of
> nested parentheses to a single one is one of these logical
> simplifications we forbid. Your text already
> implies it, but it might also be misinterpreted to only mean
> forbidding converting "(not (a:1)) and (not (b:2))" into "not ((a:1)
> or (b:2))".

OK, I added the parenthetical:
  # logical simplifications (such as removal of unneeded parentheses,
  # or simplification based on evaluating results)
in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/37491845e530

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 00:51:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:05 GMT