W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Comments on CSS3 Text Decoration

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:15:24 -0800
Message-ID: <51106B3C.1020606@inkedblade.net>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/02/2013 12:29 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 01:10 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>>
>> These comments are tracked: https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/36
>>
>> [I18N-ISSUE-248]
>>
>> 2.5 "text-decoration-skip": the value "spaces" is defined as:
>>
>> --
>> Skip white space: this includes regular spaces (U+0020) and tabs (U+0009), as well as nbsp (U+00A0), ideographic space
>> (U+3000), all fixed width spaces (such as U+2000–U+200A, U+202F and U+205F), and any adjacent letter-spacing or word-spacing.
>> --
>
> I noticed your original comments to the i18nwg also included
>    " - this is an incomplete looking definition. Define to include all whitespace?"
>
> So I also made the change to include all of Unicode general category Z.
> I'm not sure if this is correct for the Ogham Space Mark U+1680, but
> it's probably ok. Unsure about the Mongolian Vowel Separator, but I'm
> following up by asking Martin Heijdra about that...

OK, I've reverted this, because unlike the other characters in Z, the
Mongolian Vowel Separator is not a word-separating character, so should
probably stay underlined.

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0006.html

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:15:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:05 GMT