W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [text-decor-3] Emphasis marks and ruby

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:21:23 -0800
Message-ID: <510E1E03.2080305@inkedblade.net>
To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/02/2013 12:54 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 10:33 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
>>
>> I think this behavior is much better than to hide ruby in many cases.
>
> OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do
> you recommend?
>
> Question 1:
>
>    Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present?
>    a) yes
>    b) no

Third option:

      c) Allow hiding emphasis marks when ruby and marks are both present,
         instead of hiding ruby when both are present.

~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 08:21:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:05 GMT