W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-containment] ED of Containment ready for review (was overflow:clip)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:48:43 +0000
Message-ID: <-1006709772481258455@gmail297201516>
To: charleswalton@google.com, ojan@chromium.org, robert@ocallahan.org, esprehn@chromium.org, leviw@chromium.org, smfr@me.com, www-style@w3.org
On Tue Dec 10 2013 at 5:33:25 PM, Charles Walton <charleswalton@google.com>
wrote:

> If criteria 2 + 3 (the scroll-related ones) are removed, I don't see a big
> benefit in expanding the syntax beyond the current "none | strict" values.
> Being said, I'm not sure I fully understand the impact of those new
> generated content properties.
>

The point of the expanded syntax I proposed is precisely to allow the
scroll-related ones to still be available, if you need them.


> Also, are there any problems with SVG-esque stuff, like imported clip
> paths? Say "#shape" was defined within a "contain: strict" element - could
> it be referenced outside that element?
>

That is a good question.  Probably no, I would think.  Levi, Ojan, thoughts?

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 December 2013 22:49:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC