W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-masking] clip-path with invalid url

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:20:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBJR3k9J29T1pBH+M5xQ8zfBk8_SwL=kHXkdr+EHOudnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> A question that we had recently on Firefox was: You have a url() that is valid at parse time but actually does not reference anything existent. Is the computed value “none” or the url()? I would again assume the latter but would like to have a clarification.
>>
>> The url().  Always.
>
> Thanks for the clarification. In this case I would prefer to keep the specification text unchanged:
>
> “A computed value of other than ‘none' results in the creation of a stacking context […]” [1]

Yes, definitely.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 20:21:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC