W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-color][filter-effects] (was: Re: [filter-effects] Tainted filter primitives)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:51:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAjg5P7LdTbErgmWkb3cRp-y-sEAn-Gt7bgSfW-=AqF=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> I guess we should define in CSS Colors a "sanitized 'color' value" that is
> safe to be exposed to Web scripts, and in Filters define 'flood-color' and
> 'lighting-color' to use the "sanitized 'color' value" for currentColor

I'm fine with this.  So what all goes into it?  Color values coming
from :visited selectors, obviously, and transitively with
currentcolor.  Anything else?

Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 18:51:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC