W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:02:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyLn86SuHGjR-eNNyEJ8_Za_tamEubMMmxcjw-HNsZACQ0x_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Nat Duca <nduca@chromium.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Alright I'd like to reach an consensus on how to best handle stacking
context issues since so far there doesn't seem to have one yet.

Currently forcing a stack context for all usage of will-animate is better
for forward compatibility. For example 'will-animate: new-prop' would have
the same rendering for any browsers that supports it. It was said above
that forcing a stacking context isn't necessary to optimize the content by
layerizing under certain conditions. Not forcing a layer is handy for
authors where one wouldn't be otherwise required.

Do any other CSS property have the property that whether they force a
stacking context depends on their value? It might be confusing to authors
that will-animate may or may not force a stacking context.

Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 23:03:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC