On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote: > I think the current state of the proposal (where the recognized values for > will-animate are css properties, "scroll-position", and "volatile") looks > good. > Excellent! Can we bikeshed the name "volatile" now? :-) Actually I'd kinda like to bikeshed the whole thing as follows: will-change: none | [ scroll-position || contents || <ident> ] Rationale: Especially when we start describing updates to DOM contents (aka "volatile"), we're not really talking about just animation anymore. "will-change" is a bit more generic, but "will-change:transform" still works for me. Furthermore, I think "will-change:contents" is a lot more understandable than "will-change:volatile". I don't think we'll ever introduce a real "contents" property since it would be too close to "content". Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 21:33:10 UTC