W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:17:15 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbQ_jbCf-NnL5z9vCKcO0w_=55wEV=tFrZV+uXiPkkvCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: Nat Duca <nduca@chromium.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:

> Even if we could automatically infer (from "will-animate: height" on the
> blue boxes) that the green boxes would be moving, we wouldn't be able to
> differentiate between the first box (whose content is fixed, and hence
> worth caching in a layer) and the second box (whose contents are not fixed,
> and hence wasteful to cache in a layer) without a hint from the author.

It seems to me that the best solution for this example is to specify
will-animate:volatile (actually I dislike that name, but whatever) on the
second green box to indicate that its contents change.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 05:17:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC