On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com> wrote: > > The problem with that approach is that when some browser adds new-property >> and extends will-animate syntax to support new-property, and an author >> writes "will-animate: transform, new-property", other browsers get no >> will-animate at all. >> > > Can we simply require all identifiers (except all, inherit, initial, > unset) to be parsed? > Yes, we proposed that. I'm talking about the problem with Ali's approach. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 22:15:28 UTC