On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Nah, I mean that lack of interop means we may be able to drop the > quirk from engines. > I think at this point a "quirk" that's not interoperably implemented can be referred to as a "browser bug" :-). Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 20:39:16 UTC