- From: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:45:50 +0000
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Sapin [mailto:simon.sapin@exyr.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:47 AM > To: Rossen Atanassov > Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; www-style > Subject: Re: [css-grid] grid-template-areas syntax > > On 22/11/2013 21:23, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> > wrote: > >> On 22/11/2013 20:56, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >>> Yeah, double-escaping isn't great. I'm fine with defining a smaller > >>> ad-hoc syntax. Let's say: > >>> > >>> Four tokens: > >>> > >>> 1. Run of digits, ASCII letters, or non-ASCII characters. > >>> 2. Single ASCII periods. > >>> 3. Run of whitespace. > >>> 4. Anything else. > >>> > >>> Presence of #4 invalidates the property. Throw away #3. #1 and #2 > >>> constitute the cell names. > >>> > >>> This allows you to produce areas with awkward names to write as > >>> idents, but it's nice and simple. > >> > >> Sounds good, though I would add dash and underscore (U+002D and > >> U+005F) to 1, making it match "name code point": > > > > Oh, right, yes. My intention was indeed to match name code point. > > Rossen, any opinion on this? That's a good catch Simon. The proposed name code point solution sounds good, let's go with that change. Thanks, Rossen
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 00:46:20 UTC