- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:27:39 -0400
- To: "Morten Stenshorne" <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: "Scott Johnson" <sjohnson@mozilla.com>, "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le Ven 16 août 2013 16:11, Morten Stenshorne a écrit : > "Gérard Talbot" <www-style@gtalbot.org> writes: > >> Le Ven 16 août 2013 11:30, Scott Johnson a écrit : >>> [snipped] >> http://people.mozilla.org/~sjohnson/junkyard/b700367/columnbox-clip-abspos.html >> For situations where the multi-column element is the containing block of >> an abs. pos. element (say, an image), I am convinced that such abs. pos. >> img should not be clipped. It should be in front of the rel. pos. >> multi-column element and its column boxes. > > <div style="position:relative; columns:3;"> > <img style="position:absolute; width:1000%;" src="..."> > > ? > > I think the abspos should be clipped at column boundaries then, since > the multicol is the containing block. This is similar to how an abspos > behaves inside a relpos container with non-visible overflow (it gets > clipped and/or scrolled). With a non-visible overflow, you are correct: there is clipping or scrolling. But with overflow: visible, this is not what is observed, at least with abs. pos. (replaced and/or non-replaced) elements Anyways... I am confortable with whatever decision is taken with regards to multi-column element and column boxes in that issue. :) ----------- [off-topic] I've checked the §10.3.8 tests http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/chapter-10.htm#s10.3.8 we have: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/absolute-replaced-width-013.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/absolute-replaced-width-020.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/absolute-replaced-width-027.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/absolute-replaced-width-034.htm etc.. and they are all under 100% of the containing block's width. I think we need now at least one test where the abs. pos. replaced element width is set to over 100% of the containing block's width. [/off-topic] Gérard -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 17 August 2013 17:28:11 UTC