W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [CSSWG][css-overflow] First Public WD of CSS Overflow Module Level 3

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:49:10 -0700
Message-Id: <63829102-EC51-46DC-959D-6C9CBF1995DE@gmail.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>


On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:

> Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
>> So, do you think compatibility with existing overflow-x and
>> overflow-y using vertical writing mode in the wild is not a big
>> concern? Or do you think there should be two new, better-named
>> properties, such as 'overflow-inline' and 'overflow-block'?
> 
> I think we should keep overflow-x an overflow-y unchanged, and specify
> paging effects somewhere else.

This thread wasn't about paging effects, just about how overflow-x and overflow-y interact with writing modes. 
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 00:49:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC