On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:12 AM, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > I don't see how using :root solves the problem any more than disallowing > > :scope. If there's no reason for :scope to be part of this syntax, let's > > just say it matches nothing. > > We can't just say that, though, because when you absolutize "> div", > you end up with ":scope > div". That :scope has to match *something*. > It's just that the "something" can't be a real element. I find it odd that ::distributed(:scope) matches less stuff than ::distributed(:scope > div) despite the fact that the latter is more detailed. Wouldn't it be better to say that :root matches, not the Shadow Root, but its children? The rest can be done with sugar introducing :root (although I prefer a diet low in sugar, I appreciate the hardship some people find typing five characters like :-r-o-o-t.) Dominic
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 01:21:26 UTC