W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [CSSWG][css-grid-layout] Updated WD of CSS Grid Layout

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:46:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDp_Ci=g9vsX89wJ9j0ssAvOQmUnqvqLGCmoOxC3bd3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Julien Chaffraix <jchaffraix@google.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@google.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We had discussions two f2fs ago about relying solely on named areas to
>> provide names.  It's not usable.  (I tried.)
>
> It seems to have changed a lot since then, though, and I'm not sure the current melange of named grid areas and named grid lines is better. As I dig into the current version more, I'm finding it pretty confusing.

It hasn't changed in any way relevant to the discussion; we've just
rearranged some syntax.  The underlying issue is still there - lines
are tied to a more generic concept of "regions", which can overlap and
nest, unlike grid areas.  They can also repeat, which isn't compatible
with grid areas.

~TJ
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 03:47:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC