W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [CSS21] table cells establishing pseudo-stacking contexts (was Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2013-04-05)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:19:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC=gtKM-yKqab8COpNNF31HH9-j_ykbVvZqsNF7sW4kNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:31 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 12:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
>> wrote:
>>> If a table cell is promoted to an *actual* stacking context (by e.g.
>>> setting "opacity: 0.9" on it), *then* the cell's background would be
>>> part of the cell's stacking context, right?
>> Maybe?  It looks like that's what Chrome does.  However, borders still
>> belong to the table itself if they're collapsed.
> What, so you paint the table cell's background on top of its borders?
> I think that's problematic.

No, other way around: cell backgrounds are still painted underneath the borders.

The table owns the borders, and it promotes its own borders to paint
above its cells' contents.

Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 23:19:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC