W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [CSS21] table cells establishing pseudo-stacking contexts (was Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2013-04-05)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:19:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC=gtKM-yKqab8COpNNF31HH9-j_ykbVvZqsNF7sW4kNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:31 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 12:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
>> wrote:
>>> If a table cell is promoted to an *actual* stacking context (by e.g.
>>> setting "opacity: 0.9" on it), *then* the cell's background would be
>>> part of the cell's stacking context, right?
>>
>> Maybe?  It looks like that's what Chrome does.  However, borders still
>> belong to the table itself if they're collapsed.
>
> What, so you paint the table cell's background on top of its borders?
> I think that's problematic.

No, other way around: cell backgrounds are still painted underneath the borders.

The table owns the borders, and it promotes its own borders to paint
above its cells' contents.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 23:19:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC