W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [shadowdom] specificity of ::distributed()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:20:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDD52MTs09LVB0q-z858ytzToso9kG9hz4BCeKjgCt0=7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I found myself wondering about ::distributed() specificity today. Do both
> sides contribute somehow? I think these are all valid uses of
> ::distributed(), and if they all match the same element it would be useful
> to know which of these wins out over the others:
>
> 1 - ::distributed(#id)
> 2 - ::distributed(.class)
> 3 - #id::distributed(#id)
> 4 - .class::distributed(#id)

I think it should be a pass-through, so that the specificities are:

1. (1,0,0)
2. (0,1,0)
3. (2,0,0)
4. (1,1,0)

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 22:21:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 17 April 2013 22:21:10 UTC