- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:35:20 -0400
- To: Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 16:52 +0100, Adam Prescott wrote: > On 14 April 2013 16:42, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is no proposal to change functionality though, just rename -so they > > don't differ at all > > Right. But syntax hints at semantics, and the syntax was clearly > picked to represent semantics that are subtly different from notions > of setters and getters, and maybe an example would help clear that up. At the risk of annoying Tab again (sorry)... might names like my- or user- or private- emphasize the user-defined/custom aspect over the mechanism by which they are retrieved? -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 02:35:24 UTC