W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [selectors4][naming] Renaming :matches() (was: Proposal: Logical Combinators / Sets)

From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:02:08 -0400
Message-ID: <1365444128.5348.285.camel@slave.barefootcomputing.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 16:15 -0400, Brian Kardell wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2013 3:39 PM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org> wrote:

> > Has the idea of :and() been discussed? 
[...]
> That is an interesting idea...i see the rationale because CSS gives us
> comma to OR selectors together. Having said that it feels strange to have
> :and do an OR just for the fact that you have to explain it that way.

Maybe :where() would be more neutral? Or maybe that's my query
background showing, I'm not sure.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 18:02:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC