W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [css-images] conic-gradient and 'at'

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:46:47 +0200
Message-ID: <51630287.50407@exyr.org>
To: www-style@w3.org
Le 08/04/2013 19:02, Dirk Schulze a écrit :
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Tab Atkins Jr.<jackalmage@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Dirk Schulze<dschulze@adobe.com>  wrote:
>>> I am not sure if we want to keep conic-gradient at all, but I
>>> would suggest to remove the string "at" [1]. I think this just
>>> leads to more confusion for web authors. There is no need to
>>> require another string which does not have any value for the web
>>> author or the UA.
>>
>> It's there for consistency with radial-gradient(), as it's the same
>> argument.
> I don't buy this argument actually.

In radial-gradient() the 'at' is needed to disambiguate <size> vs. 
<position>.

I *think* that it’s not actually needed for conic-gradient(), but I 
agree with Tab that the consistency is nice.

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 17:47:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:10 UTC