W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:12:00 +0100
Message-ID: <5062F110.7050305@w3.org>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/05/2012 16:53, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com
> <mailto:brad.kemper@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On May 2, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com
>     <mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>      >> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline
>     directions, but
>      >> most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the
>     logical block
>      >> directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would
>     that be
>      >> clearer? Do we want to switch?
>
>
> i oppose changing, and would like to see before/after retained for
> compatibility with existing W3C usage in other specs

Strong +1 to that.

RI




Richard Ishida
Internationalization Activity Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 12:12:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:00 GMT