- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:27:31 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 26/09/2012 00:15, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > The parsing of the "color" type in attr() restricts it to being a HASH > or IDENT token - in other words, a hash color or color keyword. This > disallows the various color functions. Is this intentional? If so, > is it desirable? I'm assuming the answers to both of these questions > are "no". > > If I'm right, then we should change the "color" type to also accept a > FUNCTION token, followed by anything, ending with a ) token, and still > require it to parse into a <color> type. Actually, I think it should be anything (not just HASH, IDENT or FUNCTION+args) that parses as a <color> with whatever level of the Color module is in use. Although it is possible that all future extensions to that module will use some functional syntax. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 22:28:00 UTC