W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:32:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBwagtFiQeM1Sp=oXQpxSvdfeX0YSwNcwF_YiRjniSxMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, www-style@w3.org, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> XSL-FO is effectively a dead technology, one which we shouldn't worry
>> about when thinking about naming.
>
> Why do I get the impression you would say the same thing about XML?

I would, though it's not nearly as dead as XSL-FO is.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:33:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:00 GMT