W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [css3-transitions] Frame Rate

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:20:31 +0800
Message-ID: <505AA79F.7050701@oupeng.com>
To: Fran├žois REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
CC: Martijn Korteweg <martijn@mediaartslab.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/09/15 2:31), Fran├žois REMY wrote:
> I think Sylvain got it: it's to simulate low end hardware on high end
> hardware (ie: making sure the anim is acceptable and the jigger isn't
> too awful).

Besides this (which sounds like a feature of a development tool like
Syvain says), I can *guess* two possible use cases:

1. CSS animation is sometimes very annoying because it keeps the CPU
running high (and hence very annoying fan noise). It's not clear if it's
a QoI issue or something that limiting the frame rate would be useful.

2. 'transition-duration' isn't followed exactly because the frame rate
is too high?

I am not sure whether these are making sense, so of course it'd be
better if Martjin answers this question. Also, I recall hearing that 1.
would fail to be useful in the real world but I am not so sure.



Cheers,
Kenny
-- 
Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 05:21:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:00 GMT