W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:02:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+crtkipq-fQG2SbV0G1o2CmmUC9cvvF0WsQb6as1r45Uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote:

> >> I didn't go that far, but CSS WG to make a forever
> >> commitment for compatibility with external body sounds
> >> like a bit over-commit to me, isn't it?
> >
> > What "external body" are you referring to?
>
> I don't know, who manages the spec in Apache FOP project?
>

I guess you misunderstood me. There is no Apache FOP spec. FOP is an
implementation of W3C's XSL-FO spec. The spec is the W3C XSL-FO spec. Which
is at version 1.1 [1], but a version 2.0 was drafted [2], which, though not
actively being pursued at this time, does not mean it won't be in the
future (in the W3C).

Some persons in this thread/forum have implied that XSL-FO is dead. I am
merely disputing such imputations.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 14:03:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:01 GMT