W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Alternative to Sticky Positioning

From: Rudolph Gottesheim <r.gottesheim@loot.at>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:40:33 +0100
Message-ID: <509AAB21.7000606@loot.at>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/07/2012 06:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Unfortunately, this suffers from basic circularity problems - your
> pseudoclass applies when an element is outside of the viewport, but
> then applies rules that put it back in the airport, so the pseudoclass
> no longer applies, so it goes out of the viewport, so the pseudoclass
> applies...
>
> It also doesn't address the use-case quite right.  This pseudoclass
> would apply when the page first loaded, if the element was below the
> fold, and after the element's container scrolled off the top of the
> screen, if it was sticky to its container rather than the viewport.
>
> Finally, because your idea switches it to fixpos, which takes it out
> of the normal flow, the content surrounding it would jump around when
> it switched.  Stickypos is basically "magical relpos", where it still
> takes up space in the flow.

Right. I didn't think about those things. Thanks for your explanation 
though.
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 18:41:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:02 GMT