W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RE: The perils of prefixing... or rather trying to unprefix

From: Jinlong Zhang <jinlongz@oupeng.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 23:55:46 +0800
To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "Sebastian Zartner" <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2012110623554563803912@oupeng.com>
Vendor prefixes do bring in some perils. In our country --- China, the mobile browsers almost base on Webkit except Opera, so some web site only are webkit optimizing.
Such as : http://3g.qq.com/, http://sina.cn/ , http://m.taobao.com/ and so on.  Please see this CSS :http://3gimg.qq.com/wap30/css/info/g_index3_new.css


I'm in charge of the web site's compatibility and I encounter some problems.

Opera Mobile 12.1 has supported some unprefixed CSS rules.  I hope even more browsers support unprefixed CSS rules, or other better solutions.


Best regards,
Jinlong Zhang 
   




Zhang Jinlong --- Web Specialist

skype : jinlong3546
QQ : 237585693
Weibo : http://weibo.com/newwave




From: François REMY
Date: 2012-11-06 21:43
To: Sebastian Zartner; Boris Zbarsky
CC: www-style list
Subject: RE: The perils of prefixing... or rather trying to unprefix
The fact you need some kind of "experimental" flag doesn't mean you need prefixes...
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0282.html for more.

My point of view is still that vendor prefixes are not the good solutions and should be replace on the long run by something else.

Best regards,
François          


18327_head-foot.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: 18327_head-foot.jpg)

Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 15:56:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:02 GMT