- From: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:17:35 +0100
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Aaron Hamilton <aaron@correspondwith.me>, "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
Am 31.10.2012 17:58 schrieb Brad Kemper:
> It seems like most of this conversation, beginning with Tab's answer, has been about styling OPTIONs. But the original question was just about the un-clicked/un-tapped SELECT element and its icon on the right (which authors were hiding via 'overflow: hidden'), which is generally consistent (with variations) across browsers and platforms, including mobile. I think that question can be answered more simply.
One very basic issue about hackiness in styling the select element is
that the following CSS:
input[type=text], select {
width:10em;
border:2px solid red;
}
will result in different widths for the text and select boxes. This is
totally unintuitive and annoying.
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 08:18:02 UTC