W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Rik <coolcat_the_best@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:23:34 +0200
Message-ID: <SNT132-ds174A49DAEE5E569A5227ADCF040@phx.gbl>
To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Oh, sorry. I meant to answer all. By the way, I think the values aren't 
supposed to allaw this difference, the properties should.

in stead of this:

"float: start", "float: end"
and
"float: head" and "float: foot".

it should be this:
float-x: start", "float-x: end"
and
float-y: start", "float-y: end"

and maybe even this as addition:
float: start end", "float: end end", float: start start", "float: end start"

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- 
From: François REMY
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:15 PM
To: Rik
Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

Well, it's not up to me to make that decision. I think it's because they
want to allow "float: start", "float: end", "float: head" and "float: foot".
But ask them, I'm not sure.

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Rik
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:11 PM
To: François REMY
Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

me too. it makes more sense to me then the rest. But is it neccesary? Why
not begin/end?

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- 
From: François REMY
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:06 PM
To: CSS 3 W3C Group
Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

I like head/foot, too.
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 16:24:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:54 GMT