W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css-variables] $ for declaration? (not a variable on the left)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:46:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAA-mKBDq6_h7DrSCdtHn8EzVEmkvBLPLfS+EoCr3phRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies if this is dense...  I'm just wondering if some can explain
> why having usage and reference match is desirable?  Tab has said
> several times that he wanted it to match and some other at w3c did
> too... Ok, I can respect that I, but can someone explain why it is
> desirable?  It's non-obvious to me.
> Several people (myself included) have raised all kinds of contentions,
> some debated and deemed invalid and some not.  I posted some thoughts
> advocating why not [1] but that thread quickly went downhill as $ on
> the left making some people assume that either: a) that was a variable
> reference (it wasn't) or b) not being able to have a variable
> reference on the left was a bad idea (I think it isn't) and therefore
> an argument against $ for declaration (I don't think it is, but the
> confusion that ensued might be).
> I'm definitely not saying it is _wrong_ or anything, just that I can
> only reasons that it doesn't seem desirable right now... Can someone
> share the reasons it is?

Because then it's nice and easy to see the relationship, and because,
in general, languages use the same syntax for setting and using

Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 21:47:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:35:10 UTC