W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] order

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:24:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDB-vBH08_Ys3YVKZhDkJxtOYBEE11ECz3pd+bzKT4hyYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> To be clear, I was suggesting that row-reverse/column-reverse/wrap-reverse
> should also affect tab-order.

Ah, that wasn't clear.  Okay.  So tab order should always be "visual
order", more or less.

>> I think what it actually means is that we need a less naive treatment
>> of selections.  (I don't know what that would be, though.)
>
> Correct. We need to solve one problem or the other. The status quo is really
> bad IMO. I suppose as these sorts of things become more prevalent, there
> will be more pressure on browser vendors to do the more complicated disjoint
> selections. It makes selection code much more CPU intensive though. :(

Yeah, it's a hard problem.  Sorry. :/

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 17:25:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:54 GMT