- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 10:27:06 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 22 May 2012 03:11:41 +0200, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > > [Tab Atkins Jr.:] >> >> The Lists 3 module has been sitting at WD for several months now, because >> a few pieces (mostly marker positioning) need more review before I'm >> comfortable requesting LC for it. (By the way, review marker positioning >> so I can request LC for it!) >> >> However, fantasai pointed out in private conversation during the f2f that >> the @counter-style part of the spec has received decent review and >> interest, and could proceed independently of the stuff about marker >> positioning and the like. >> >> Would anyone object if I pulled the @counter-style and symbols() function >> out into a separate spec that I could then request LC for? I could >> perhaps push it into the http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/ spec >> so we could have a proper argument over what styles to make normatively >> required again. >> ^_^ >> > How much work would you estimate is left for marker positioning that it > Justifies spinning up a new draft, getting FWPW etc. ? I guess I'm not > sure why y you wouldn't move the marker positioning to L4 and LC > the rest now? +1 for pushing marker positioning to L4, and LC the rest now. - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 08:27:59 UTC