W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css2.1][css3-fonts] keywords in unquoted font family names

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:13:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA6ScJDLtvowd6eYpyhMKmOWGKsb2LvUdyVUbpgssWE5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote:
> On May 18, 2012, at 08:34, John Daggett wrote:
>> Both Tab and Elika feel that any unquoted name that includes
>> keywords like 'inherit' should be invalid, so declarations like
>> the ones below would be invalid:
>>  font-family: foo inherit;
>>  font-family: inherit foo;
> I don't see any ambiguity in the spec about these. They are valid family names. Some real-world examples would be:
>    font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif
>    font-family: Schoolhouse Cursive B

I don't understand.  Neither of your examples have global keywords in
them, so they don't seem to be relevant.

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 18:15:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:59 UTC