W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

RE: [css3-animations] animation-reverse: none | all | even | odd

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:12:49 +0000
To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F0178290A34B6CC@TK5EX14MBXC263.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

[Lea Verou:]
> 
> On 6/5/12 19:54, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> > [Lea Verou:]
> >> FWIW, I blogged about it, in order to get more author feedback:
> >> http://lea.verou.me/2012/05/is-animation-direction-a-good-idea/
> >> It's Sunday so the interwebs are quiet, but the few comments it got
> >> so far are overwhelmingly in favor of animation-reverse over the
> current syntax.
> >>
> > Overwhelming is a pretty big word for 5 comments :) But gathering
> > feedback with a blog post is great. Thank you!
> >
> I'm afraid you misunderstood :)
> I said the comments are "overwhelmingly in favor of it" (i.e. every
> *individual* comment), not that the *number* of comments is
> overwhelming ;)
> 
I know what you meant. What I'm saying is that 5 is far too small an
opinion sample about anything for any 'overwhelming' result thereof to
have any meaning.
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:13:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:53 GMT