W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-animations] `alternate-reverse` vs `alternate reverse`

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:07:33 -0700
Message-ID: <4FA863C5.1060405@inkedblade.net>
To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
CC: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/07/2012 06:41 AM, Lea Verou wrote:
>
> On 7/5/12 07:41, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
>>
>> As a non-English native speaker, may I ask why we use 'reverse' here
>> instead of 'reversed'?
> Kenny might have a point here. Every time I taught people about `repeating-linear-gradient`, they kept mistakenly typing it as
> `repeated-linear-gradient`. I'd guess it’s the same thing here.

This is why we try not to put grammatical suffixes into our names.
I'm sorry we didn't catch this one... it should have been
   repeat-linear-gradient

:(

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:34:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:53 GMT