W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Proposition to change the prefixing policy

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:11:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dvuX0EdB=ua59_W8+cM9XLOT-zjkfMt4U=f8dE4NrazA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tantek's proposal, which he brought to the group late in the last
> Paris FtF, hits approximately the same sweet spot but with less
> ambiguity - it's nearly a mechanical process.  As a reminder, his
> proposal is that, at the moment anyone can prove two interop
> implementations of a feature with a WG-approved testsuite, we cut that
> feature into an LC->CR draft.  In effect, we have a constantly-moving
> ED, with snapshots of testably-interop features calved off as
> necessary.
>
> I think that Florian's proposal matches what a lot of us want to see,
> and that Tantek's proposal accomplishes Florian's goals with the least
> ambiguity (and thus greatest chance of success) of all the variants
> I've heard so far.  We should adopt it.


Given your summary of Tantek's proposal, I think I support it as well.
However, I would like to see it in concrete form to be sure. Is it well
documented at some link?
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 16:12:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:53 GMT