W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

RE: [css3-text] Editorial: Example 24 should be a note

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 04:11:09 -0400
To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A592E245B36A8949BDB0A302B375FB4E0D3C3C8070@MAILR001.mail.lan>
Agreed and fixed now, thank you for the review.

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Rivoal [mailto:florianr@opera.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:11 PM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: [css3-text] Editorial: Example 24 should be a note


Example 24 (the one that says "One example of good fonts for emphasis marks [...]") isn't really an example, as it doesn't illustrate how to use features introduced by the specification.

Despite containing the word example early on in the sentence, I believe it really is a note, and should be relabeled as such.

  - Florian

Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 08:12:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:58 UTC