W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 08:53:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fhpC_H3zx6mTvTSqgtTbeSU9=x+VO4_mHk_n8iFHe2tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On May 2, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline directions, but
> >> most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the logical block
> >> directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would that be
> >> clearer? Do we want to switch?


i oppose changing, and would like to see before/after retained for
compatibility with existing W3C usage in other specs
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 15:54:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:53 GMT