- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 05:33:41 +0200
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012, 11:19:49 PM, Brian wrote: BM> Example A BM> linear-gradient(red 10%, blue 20%, green 15%); BM> Reviewing the language... BM> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#color-stop-syntax BM> # Color-stops must be specified in order. BM> What does "must" mean for example A? Does it mean it should be BM> rejected by parser? Does it mean "invalid; renders as transparent"? BM> Previously, I've taken it to mean "bad author, we'll fix it for BM> them according to the normative steps". If that interpretation is BM> correct, is "must" really the right word? Looks like "should" is appropriate there. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 03:34:08 UTC