Re: [selectors4] Universal Selector '*' (asterisk) elsewhere

On 29 Mar, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote:

> I assume the following are equivalent already, although not explicitly mentioned:
> 
>  E
>  E[]
> 

I don't think so. As far as I can tell, an attribute selector without an attribute name is invalid.

--
Sent from my iPhone
--
Daniel Tan/BoltClock
NOVALISTIC • Stellar Software Development & Design
<http://NOVALISTIC.com>

Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 09:49:35 UTC