W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [css3-images] Animatability of object-fit, object-position, image-resolution, and image-orientation

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:55:39 -0700
Message-ID: <4F74076B.6020500@inkedblade.net>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/28/2012 11:33 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 2012-03-28 23:16 -0700, fantasai wrote:
>> Seem to have forgotten to update the spec with the Animatability field.
>> Suggested values:
>>
>>    object-fit:        no
>>    object-position:   yes
>>    image-resolution:  no
>>    image-orientation: no
>
> The "yes" should instead be "as percentage, length", and should
> probably link to
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#animation-of-property-types- .

Should Animatable be a link or the value be a link?

Also, is it possible to animate between positions with different origins,
or should that be specified as unanimatable?

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 06:57:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 03:48:53 GMT