W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [css4-values] Templated URLs

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:17:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4F698E8B.70202@kozea.fr>
To: www-style@w3.org
Le 21/03/2012 00:31, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> /**
>> >    * Gravatar without<img>  tag
>> >    *
>> >    * @memo
>> >  https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/36d07341931078d5125fa99397a34ed8?s=140&d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png
>> >    *
>> >    * @todo make this doable with a javascript
>> >    * @link
>> >  http://darcyclarke.me/development/quick-tip-get-gravatar-images-from-emails-with-javascript/
>> >    */
>> >
>> >  [data-gravatar-uri]::after
>> >  {
>> >      content: url(attr(data-gravatar-uri)); /* impossible */
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  [data-email-md5]::after
>> >  {
>> >      content: url("http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/"  attr(data-email-md5)
>> >  "?s=100"); /* more impossible */
>> >  }
>> >
>> >
>> >  [data-email-md5][data-gravatar-size]::after
>> >  {
>> >      content: url("http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/"  attr(data-email-md5) "?s="
>> >  attr(data-gravatar-size) ); /* more&  more impossible */
>> >  }
> I support the use-case, but I dunno how to accomplish it.  url() is
> pretty much ruined; the fact that we didn't require it to contain a
> quoted string originally pretty much prevents us from doing anything
> useful inside of it.


Wouldn’t image() work at least for the first case?

Some spec change / new feature would be needed for the two other cases, 
but image() seems to have better chances than url() (which is parsed as 
a single token to allow omitting quotes)

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 08:17:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 03:48:53 GMT