- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:12:47 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, I want to add a new agenda item for the CSS WG call tomorrow: "CSS3 Transform and transform-origin syntax" There was a discussion on www-style[1] about the syntax of transform-origin recently. The discussion didn't reach to a conclusion. Because this is a blocking issue for the 2d part of the spec, it should have a high priority. To summarize the topic: Should 'transform-origin' have the same syntax like 'background-position'. If yes, how do we behave on the 3D part of transform-origin? 2D part can have up to 4 arguments. Add a slash after the 2d part that separates it from the 3d translation (a length value)? Add a new property for 3D translation named transform-origin-z that takes a length value? If not, can calc() be used to combine arguments the same way as it is possible for 'background-position' '' (i.e. calc(top 10px))? Should transform-origin just support up to 3 arguments for horizontal, vertical and z translation? Greetings, Dirk
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:13:13 UTC