On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 06/25/2012 03:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Agreed with fantasai here. Part of the reason for including 'order' >> at all was to allow authors to order their source in the best, most >> logical way, with the important content up front and the lesser >> content later in the document, and then lay it out in whatever way >> makes the most sense. Whether the navigation section appears on the >> left or right of the main content section shouldn't matter, but in >> today's world it does due to styling limitations, and 'order' lets us >> fix that. >> >> So, I'm *for* order affecting tab-order by default, and *against* it >> affecting speech order by default. > > > So, you want tab order to: > - if the sidebar is on the left, enter navigation first, article second > - if the sidebar is on the right, enter article first, navigation second > ? Gah, good point. I'm thinking more of the cases where, say, you use 'order' to bring one item to the front. For example, if I have some featured comments on my blogpost implemented by tagging them with class='featured' and ".featured { order: -1; }", I'd like them to be first when tabbing through all the "reply" buttons. So basically, the two primary use-cases for 'order' (arbitrary page layout, and pulling some elements to the front of a container) have completely different desired default behaviors. :/ ~TJReceived on Monday, 25 June 2012 23:54:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT