W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:14:13 +1000
Message-ID: <4FE47DB5.3070101@css-class.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 2/05/2012 10:53 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le May 2, 2012 à 2:59 AM, fantasai a écrit :
>
>> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline directions,
>> but most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the logical
>> block directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would
>> that be clearer? Do we want to switch?
>
> That is quite obscure, particularly for people who are not English speakers (and/or don't 'think' in English). -before/-after is (conceptually) much clearer to me and says exactly what is in the package.


Agree also with before/after.


-- 
Alan Gresley
http://css-3d.org/
http://css-class.com/
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 14:14:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT