- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:51:11 +0200
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
I do not feel strongly about the syntax, I’ll leave the bikesheding to others. Le 21/06/2012 22:32, François REMY a écrit : > | [about $attr()] > | > | So the attribute value would go through the CSS tokenizer? It could have > | comments, backslash-escapes and everything? > > This is the idea. However, it don't have to go through the full tokenizer > because, to be valid, the stream has to conform to the <value> type. I don’t understand what you mean. Attribute values are Unicode strings. The process of going from a single string to a list of token is called tokenization. We already have a well-defined tokenizer for CSS. Do you propose having a different, "dumb" tokenizer for attr()? I don’t see how this relate to whether a token stream matches <value>. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 12:51:43 UTC